Is It Ethical To Use Gene Editing Technology To Create "Designer Babies" With Preferred Physical Traits Or Abilities?

Introduction:

The debate over the ethics of using gene editing technology to create "designer babies" has been raging for several years. The idea of using genetic engineering to select desirable physical traits or abilities in offspring seems like something straight out of science fiction, but with advances in technology, it has become a reality. However, with the advent of such a technology, several ethical and moral questions have arisen. Is it ethical to use gene editing technology to create "designer babies" with preferred physical traits or abilities? This essay will explore both sides of the argument and come to a conclusion.

Argument For:

The proponents of using gene editing technology to create "designer babies" argue that it is a revolutionary technology that could be used to eradicate genetic diseases. By selecting and editing out problematic genes, parents could prevent their children from inheriting diseases such as cystic fibrosis, Huntington's disease, and sickle cell anemia. Gene editing could also be used to prevent diseases that are caused by multiple genes or a combination of genetic and environmental factors, such as diabetes and heart disease. This could potentially lead to a healthier population, free from genetic diseases.

In addition, gene editing could be used to enhance desirable traits such as intelligence, athleticism, and beauty. The ability to select and edit genes that code for these traits could create a generation of individuals who are physically and mentally superior to their peers. This could lead to a more productive and successful society, as people with enhanced traits would be more capable of achieving success.

Proponents of gene editing also argue that it would be a form of reproductive autonomy for parents. They should have the right to choose what traits their child should have, just like they have the right to choose what school their child should attend or what food they should eat. Parents have a moral obligation to give their child the best possible start in life, and if gene editing technology can help them do that, then it should be available to them.

Argument Against:

On the other hand, opponents of using gene editing technology to create "designer babies" argue that it is a violation of natural human reproduction. The idea of selecting and editing genes goes against the basic principles of human reproduction, which is based on random combinations of genetic material from two parents. This natural process ensures genetic diversity, which is essential for the survival of the human species.

Opponents also argue that gene editing technology could lead to a society where certain traits are valued more than others, leading to discrimination against individuals who do not possess those traits. This could lead to a more divided and unequal society, with the genetically enhanced individuals having an unfair advantage over their peers. It could also lead to a loss of diversity, as everyone would strive to possess the same desirable traits.

In addition, gene editing technology could have unintended consequences. The long-term effects of editing genes are not fully understood, and there could be unforeseen side effects that could harm the child. The technology could also be misused, such as creating children with enhanced physical or mental abilities for military purposes or other unethical reasons.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, the debate over the ethics of using gene editing technology to create "designer babies" is a complex one. While there are potential benefits to using gene editing technology to prevent genetic diseases and enhance desirable traits, there are also serious ethical concerns regarding the violation of natural human reproduction, discrimination, and unintended consequences. While the technology is still in its infancy, it is important to consider both the potential benefits and the ethical concerns before making any decisions about its use. Ultimately, it is up to society to determine whether the potential benefits of gene editing outweigh the ethical concerns.

Written By Adil Sukumar